CROOKED COP: Baltimore Police Detective Robert Hankard Convicted of Providing BB Gun to Frame Suspect, Lying to Grand Jury, Falsifying Police Reports

Baltimore, Maryland –

The Deadly City of Demons has crooks everywhere; Baltimore City States Attorney Marilyn Mosby is awaiting trial for criminal charges of committing perjury to obtain loans claiming her finances were a wreck due to the pandemic, Baltimore politicians are witless wonks incapable of operating a sewage treatment plant, and now another Baltimore City cop is headed to the slammer for crooked dealings on the job.

Baltimore City States Attorney Marilyn Mosby.

A federal jury on April 11, 2022,  convicted former Baltimore City Police Officer Robert Hankard, 45, of Baltimore, Maryland, of multiple federal crimes for providing a BB gun that he knew would be planted on a suspect, falsely testifying to a federal grand jury about his role in the BB gun planting, falsifying an application for a search warrant and an arrest report in a second incident where drugs were planted on a suspect, that he falsely testified to a federal grand jury in a federal investigation, and falsifying an application for a search warrant and subsequent police report related to the search of an apartment.

Fox 45 reported: According to Hankdard’s indictment, Hankard’s partner, Det. Carmine Vignola asked him on March 26, 2014, while he was off-duty if he had any “toys” or “replicas,” meaning he was asking for “a BB gun or airsoft gun so that it could be planted on a suspect.”


Prosecutors said Hankard was helping Vignola and former Sgt. Keith Gladstone, who wanted to frame a man. Vignola and Gladstone both pleaded guilty in the incident.

Hankard was also accused of giving permission to plant some cocaine found in a motel room in another suspect’s truck, during a drug investigation on Sept. 24, 2015. He also made false entries in the search warrants and the police reports about incidents.

The conviction was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Erek L. Barron and Special Agent in Charge Thomas J. Sobocinski of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Baltimore Field Office.

“Today’s conviction further demonstrates this office’s continuing commitment to protect the civil rights of all Marylanders, including from egregious instances of police misconduct,” said United States Attorney Erek L. Barron.  “I commend the outstanding work of Assistant United States Attorneys Leo J. Wise and Christopher M. Rigali, in obtaining this guilty verdict and recognize the FBI Special Agents and Task Force Officers who conducted this investigation.   Criminals who work in police agencies violate the faith of the community and they unfairly tarnish the reputations of the many honorable officers who work to protect us every day.”

“As evidenced by the jury’s guilty verdict, the actions of Mr. Hankard were not only harmful to the individuals he swore under oath to protect, but they also undermined public trust and confidence in law enforcement,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Thomas J. Sobocinski.  “The FBI will not tolerate those who abuse their positions of authority and is committed to rooting out public corruption and civil rights violations at all levels. We appreciate all our law enforcement partners who have assisted on this case.”

COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS: We agree with the State that the court should have considered not only whether
Detective Hankard, on this record, was an essential witness, but also (whether or not he
was essential) the totality of the circumstances bearing on the integrity of the conviction
and the interests of justice and fairness. In cases like this, the State—the prosecuting
authority that pursued and obtained the conviction in the first place—is asserting that the
conviction has been tainted to the extent that it is inconsistent with the interests of justice
and fairness to leave it intact. The State isn’t saying that Mr. Walker is innocent of the
crimes, but instead that it no longer can defend the integrity of the body of evidence
underlying that conviction.

According to the trial evidence, Hankard has been a member of the Baltimore Police Department (BPD) since 2007 and was promoted to detective on March 20, 2014.  In 2014 and 2015, Hankard served on a Special Enforcement Section (SES) unit assigned to the BPD’s Western District.  On the evening of March 26, 2014, Hankard, who was not on duty that day, received a call from his partner, who advised him that Sergeant W.J. had been “hemmed up” in something and asked Hankard if he had any “toys” or “replicas.”  Hankard understood that his partner was asking for a BB gun or airsoft gun so that it could be planted on a suspect.  Hankard advised that he did have a BB gun.  Hankard’s partner came to Hankard’s house and Hankard provided him with the BB gun, which was subsequently planted at the scene of the arrest of D.S., whom Sergeant W.J. had run over after chasing D.S.  No guns or drugs were recovered from D.S. at the time of his arrest, but drugs were recovered from D.S. at the hospital, where he had been taken into the custody of the Baltimore Police officers.  D.S. was charged with possession, use, and discharge of a gas or pellet gun, for the BB gun that was planted at the scene of D.S.’s arrest, and a number of drug offenses.  D.S. was detained on those charges until at least April 2, 2014, and the charges were dismissed on January 16, 2015.

The trial evidence showed that on March 2, 2015, Hankard and other officers arrested I.R. in the 5100 block of Falls Road in Baltimore City.  Hankard and other officers took I.R.’s keys and went to Apartment A at 15 Cross Keys Road, which I.R. had been seen leaving earlier that day.  I.C. lived in Apartment A with her daughter. Hankard used one of the keys that had been taken from I.R. to open the door to Apartment A and Hankard and other officers entered the apartment, which was not occupied at that time.  Once inside, Hankard searched a bag that he found inside a closet, which contained gel caps of heroin, two digital scales, and other drug paraphernalia.  Hankard had not obtained a search warrant prior to entering the apartment or searching the bag.  Hankard then left the apartment and returned to BPD to prepare a search warrant for Apartment A.  Several BPD officers remained inside Apartment A and one of those officers called I.C. and asked her to return, which she voluntarily did.  I.C. then waited inside the apartment with the officers.

On the evening of March 2, 2015, Hankard appeared before a judge in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and swore out the search warrant that he had prepared after entering Apartment A, in which Hankard allegedly falsely claimed that the “exterior” of Apartment A was secured, not disclosing that he and other detectives had entered Apartment A prior to obtaining a search warrant.  Nor did Hankard disclose that he had opened a bag containing gel caps with heroin, scales, and other paraphernalia prior to preparing a search warrant.  After obtaining the warrant, Hankard returned to the apartment where the other officers were waiting with I.C.  During the execution of the search warrant, the bag that Hankard had previously searched was seized along with its contents, and I.C. was arrested.  I.R. was ultimately charged with drug offenses related to their seizure.  Following the execution of the search warrant, the evidence showed that Hankard authored official BPD reports that contained similar false statements.


Witnesses testified that on September 24, 2015, Hankard arrested D.B., a target in a drug investigation, as he sat in his pick-up truck in a motel parking lot.  According to trial testimony, after removing D.B. from the vehicle, Hankard and his partner searched the vehicle, but no drugs were found.  Other officers on the scene then went into the room where D.B. had been staying and found a woman, B.J., a large quantity of heroin that had not yet been packaged for distribution, and a small quantity of cocaine that had already been packaged for distribution.  The officers had not obtained a search warrant before entering the room.  After learning that no drugs had been found in the truck, another officer, with Hankard’s permission, planted some of the cocaine found in the motel room in D.B.’s truck, in order to justify the arrest of D.B. and B.J. and the entry into the motel room.

According to the evidence, Hankard subsequently wrote a search warrant for the motel room, which contained several false statements, including that his partner had “observed in plain view, a clear tied bag, that contained small zip lock bags (with red dice logo) of suspected cocaine (after opening the clear bag, it revealed 10 ziplock bags total)” in D.B.’s truck; that D.B. was seen throwing the package of suspected cocaine to the floor of the vehicle; that after making sure the motel room card key worked, detectives had secured the room pending a search warrant; and that Hankard “believes there is addition suspected controlled dangerous substances (CDS)” in the motel room.


As detailed in trial testimony, after the search warrant was obtained and executed at the motel room, Hankard prepared a false incident report, which was approved by his partner as the “officer-in-charge” at the time of the arrests, even though the SES unit’s Sergeant was on the scene at the time.

Further, the evidence showed that on February 13, 2019, Hankard falsely testified before a federal grand jury by stating that he had not provided the BB gun to his partner on March 26, 2014.

Hankard faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison for conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States; a maximum of 10 years in federal prison for conspiracy to deprive civil rights; a maximum of 20 years in federal prison for each of two counts of falsification of records in a federal investigation; and a maximum of five years in federal prison for false declarations before a grand jury.  U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake has not scheduled a date for sentencing.  Hankard remains released under the supervision of U.S. Pretrial Services.



Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.